![]() Once the elements are properly divided, a gap as shown in the image below would be visible with shrink view on. I do understand that in this case, 1 vehicle represents the UDL and other represents the axel loads. To rectify this, the element could be divided by the said node as shown in the image below or these elements could be recreated. Essentially, it isn't possible to load the same lane with 2 different vehicle simultaneously, because practically this isn't possible. ![]() So, there is no intermediate support from such pier location and hence the analysis is failing. This basically means that the node does not divide that particular element and hence here is no force transfer from the main girder to the said master node. It could be noted that at several master node locations, the element is not shrinking. This option basically shrinks the element between the nodes in proportion to its actual length. The above image is taken after enabling the shrink option from view tab. The reason for failure is actually incorrect geometric modelling. I am assuming it is too large a file? Is there anything I can do to refine the model to allow me to solve with traffic loading? Answer:Hello, At our end, the model is failing even under self weight. I am happy that the model is correct however when I add the traffic loading it will not solve. I attach a model of a bridge I am working on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |